spot_img

Forensic Investigations links Naira Marley with Visa card fraud

Must read

Dolapo Shadipe
Dolapo Shadipe
A creative Web Content Writer and Editor with over four years of experience creating, editing and publishing relatable contents across diverse niches.

Forensic Investigations links Naira Marley with Visa card fraud

Whyte Dein, a cybercrime expert has told the Federal High Court in Lagos that a forensic investigation by his team links Azeez Fashola a.k.a. Naira Marley, with Visa card fraud.

Mr Dein, who is a Chief Detective Officer and Head of the Cybercrime Section of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), testified before Justice Nicholas Oweibo in Naira Marley’s trial for a said cybercrime offence.

The witness was led in evidence by EFCC prosecutor Mr Rotimi Oyedepo.

According to the EFCC, Naira Marley committed the offences on different dates between November 26, 2018, and December 11, 2018, as well as May 10, 2019.The EFCC said that some of the credit cards discovered in the defendant’s residence have the fictitious names Nicole Louise Malyon and Timea Fedorne Tatar.

According to the agency, these were used for internet scams.

Naira Marley had pleaded not guilty during his arraignment on May 20, 2019, and is out on bail.

At the resumption of proceedings, Dein told the court that his team’s investigation revealed various messages sent from the defendant’s iPhone to one Raze, who had asked for a credit card number and validity date.

“One of our findings from the forensic report shows the exchange of chat messages with several persons when the defendant sent credit card details, including card numbers and expiration dates. Visa card details were one of those sent by the defendant to a certain person known on his contact list as Raze. This message sent Visa Card details to Raze, after which Raze replied to him that the card was not valid.

“We were able to establish through investigation the previous messages he sent with a wrong card that was indeed not valid. We then repeated the same process a second time which was now valid.”

- Advertisement -spot_img

More articles

- Advertisement -spot_img

Latest article